Why is there basically no coverage for the whole province of manitoba?

  • 2
  • Question
  • Updated 4 years ago
  • Answered
I notice that I'm the only person in my company who can't use my cell phone in manitoba. When I look at the coverage maps I can see that there is extremely limited coverage for the entire province including some of highway 1. SaskTel phones use the same network as bell/telus/koodo and they work fine here in manitoba. is there a reason for this? obviously the network infrastructure is in place.....
Photo of Findlay MacDermid

Findlay MacDermid

  • 140 Points 100 badge 2x thumb

Posted 4 years ago

  • 2
Photo of KaneSlavik

KaneSlavik

  • 6,464 Points 5k badge 2x thumb
Rogers/MTS are the reason.
Photo of Timo Tuokkola

Timo Tuokkola, Mobile Master

  • 142,506 Points 100k badge 2x thumb
To clarify, Rogers and MTS signed an exclusive agreement to share the existing HSPA network. If anyone else wants to provide coverage they have to build their own network from the ground up.
Photo of Findlay MacDermid

Findlay MacDermid

  • 140 Points 100 badge 2x thumb
Below is the text of the complaint I filed with CRTC over this. It's not all Koodo's fault but I feel ripped off that there is no coverage in the whole province. This should be made more clear.

Koodo/Telus/ Bell advertise themselves as national carriers but provide extremely limited service in the province of Manitoba. Almost no service is available off of Highway 1 and in fact not all of highway one is even covered as it is virtually everywhere else in the country. Large towns are not covered and neither are virtually all the roads in the province. This stands in stark contrast to the service provided in the rest of the country where large areas or remote or rural country side are covered. This presents sever problems for me as a user:
1. The device I count on for work and road safety does not work as it does in the rest of the country
2. Even though I receive no service I still pay the same monthly bill
The upshot is that I end up having to get a new MTS or rogers account and either using it or having my calls forwarded to a local 204 number. When I signed the service agreement with Koodo I was not made aware that there was little to no service in Manitoba; a fact that would have influenced my purchasing decision since I travel regularly for work. I realize that this situation is the result of what is effectively an embargo agreement between MTS and Rogers and thus is not entirely Koodo’s fault. My complaint to the CRTC is that companies are allowed to create zones where other service providers are barred from effectively offering service. This only serves to reduce competition in the local market and infuriate customers from neighbouring provinces not on Rogers. My complaint regarding Koodo is that this fact was not made abundantly clear to me when I signed up for my service contract. Obviously as a user I expect that not all areas of the country are covered by mobile networks but I do expect that the standard of service should not be vastly different between adjacent provinces where factors such as terrain and population density are not radically different.
So far as I can see ths problem can only be resolved by the regulator or by a huge expenditure by koodo/telus/bell that they are unlikely to make.
Photo of Ahmad

Ahmad

  • 96,102 Points 50k badge 2x thumb
Because it's not the CRTC's job to.

You're making a big deal out of something that can't be controlled. You literally want to either a) force carriers to make agreements with each other to use each others networks and make themselves less competitive or b) make the carriers build more towers which also isn't going to happen. Just because you don't like the way a business works, you can't change it becuase you feel like it. Koodo is not run by the CRTC or the government and neither is any other carrier.

It's your job as a consumer to do your research before buying anything. Nothing was hidden from you and there was no misrepresentation
Photo of KaneSlavik

KaneSlavik

  • 6,464 Points 5k badge 2x thumb
Because Koodo has CDMA service across Canada(as well as HSPA, to most degrees), they can be classified as a National Carrier.
Photo of Findlay MacDermid

Findlay MacDermid

  • 140 Points 100 badge 2x thumb
so when they shut down CDMA service, which they are doing shortly, then they will no longer be a national carrier? I tried to get my phone activated on the CDMA network and they wouldn't do it. That would solve the problem as many phone are capable of downgrading (Iphones for example or any "global" or "world" phone)
Photo of Findlay MacDermid

Findlay MacDermid

  • 140 Points 100 badge 2x thumb
Try it, call them up and tell them you want to put your phone on the CDMA network.... see what they say....
Photo of Timo Tuokkola

Timo Tuokkola, Mobile Master

  • 142,506 Points 100k badge 2x thumb
Check the specs for your phone again. Is it CDMA or WCDMA? The two are very different networks. CDMA is an early 2G communication standard. WCDMA is a 3G standard built off of the GSM network, a different network with completely different protocols. The only company offering an iphone capable of a CDMA connection is Verizon, and even that is ONLY on the Verizon network, since CDMA phones cannot be unlocked from their original provider.
Photo of Timo Tuokkola

Timo Tuokkola, Mobile Master

  • 142,636 Points 100k badge 2x thumb
I don't know where you got the idea that Koodo/Telus have towers in MB. They don't. Neither does Bell. MTS has towers. From 1908 until 1996 they were a government owned Crown corporation who effectively controlled all telecommunications in MB. Rogers signed a deal which allows them, and only them, to share these towers. Cell towers cost an average of $150,000.00 apiece to build. No cell company is going to go to the expense of building towers and then make an executive decision not to use them.
Photo of Findlay MacDermid

Findlay MacDermid

  • 140 Points 100 badge 2x thumb
It must have been from the marketing about covering 97% of the Canadian population or something. I guess I missed the fine print about not including manitoba. I'm not suggesting that they made a decision not to use the towers, I'm saying they are not building them. I'm aware that they are expensive which is why it is so stupid to have companies building towers next to one and other.
Photo of Dennis

Dennis, Mobile Master

  • 196,568 Points 100k badge 2x thumb
It does cover over 70% of Manitoba's population which includes its top 4 cities (by population)
Photo of KaneSlavik

KaneSlavik

  • 6,464 Points 5k badge 2x thumb
The 97% was for the CDMA network. HSPA coverage is not nearly as wide spread as the CDMA network.
Photo of Rocky Balboa

Rocky Balboa

  • 20,414 Points 20k badge 2x thumb
Only people to blame is MTS and Rogers. CRTC as no say on this. Botton line, MTS and Rogers signed an agreement to make any other cell phone provider build their own network if they want coverage. As previously mentioned it's $150,000 roughly per tower. It's no different signed the agreement with Tbay Tel in Northern Ontario. Only Rogers customers can roam on Tbay Tel towers for free and get excellent coverage.

This conversation is no longer open for comments or replies.